Thursday, August 12, 2010

How To Decorate A Finch Aviary

regarding homosexuality


Any sexual act, although not always explicitly directed to reproduction, it is intended to prop up an institution, the family.
The family is the fundamental characteristic of human society and all aspects of our behavior. Otherwise they would if the play could be performed with different methods, so for example in societies of ants or bees, the organization is different, and playback is handled by a single female. The only way you can be playing for the man, is through the woman, because there are no technological alternative, but even if there were would never be perfect as the natural one. When and why you quit the purpose of building a family and acquire a sexual behavior is not aimed at this goal? In a family there are two figures sex, parents, and both are necessary. The male figure of a father and then his role in a family, may become void in the education of a boy, only to be delegated to the mother, in a society like ours, where the life of a parent can be absorbed completely within the company where he works. That's why it would be useful to conduct an activity that another employee working independently. A guy who has no feelings that link him to his father and vice versa, has led to an imbalance of affection and live too hard friendly relations with their peers, but at the same time to live in a neglected and superficial relationships of friendship, and then this imbalance leads to centralize in a single male figure all the others that you would like to be surrounded, even the father is not known. The educational role of the father's behavior is essential: the education of children is not derived from the school, but begins in the family, as well as the first report of work. The absence of his father, turned into a useless figure in our social system, which entrusts the education at state schools and makes each work as a place of employment at firms rare, transformed family life and the roles of imbalances which it made. Failure to link parent-child, a boy put in a disadvantage compared to their peers, and causes him to feel inferior, and to choose a voluntary task subsidiary. When there is a father, the child loses self-esteem, inferiority complexes accumulating and insecurity, that misconceptions and negative, is misunderstood, it becomes fragile and depressed, and thus submissive. Homosexuality is to seek an emotional connection with people and is an ideal way to be superior because it comes from a better education. A gay relationship is always superficial. Another possibility is that a gay relationship lasts a long time, but it must be remembered that revolve around each other person affective figures, if not, create an imbalance, ie a double life gay sex you can not hide. A couple's relationship, if you do not permit entry to all others, or does not give rise to a family with the arrival of children, surely you will come to break with the treachery and turns into a relationship of open-ended. _________________



I state that from my point of view of psychoanalysis stems from the belief that what we are, our sexual behavior is the result of an education, social conditioning and emotional. Homosexuality depends on the lack of emotional ties he had with same-same, and then a son with his father. Some psychoanalysts and physicians studying the sexual behavior of other animal species and looking at how widespread also prefer to conclude that it is inherent in the genetic saying that we are acting on the mechanical function of a genetic program, and the feelings and emotional ties are already planned. As if the animals do not fall in love too, as if they had a family too. It supports the thesis of genetic causes in an attempt to make socially acceptable homosexual define them innocent of their diversity, they attribute the cause to faulty immutable and concluded that you can not change, which is in many other homosexuals but a conviction that equates for the disabled. To say that homosexuality is dependent on genetic factors mean to argue that you can not change, and that prevents to improve their emotional state when it is disappointing because it tends to exclusion. A homosexual who can not manage your love life in a satisfactory manner, could have the suicide, or be further marginalized. Sexuality is influenced by an emotional balance, starting with parents and persons in the course of his life we \u200b\u200bhappen to meet it may improve or worsen. If a newborn baby is adopted by a monkey in the isolation of a forest, was unable to identify with a man. One identifies a person who knows us and knows how to interpret our needs, and knows that affect our choices as the form itself in the bud by not yet sufficiently clear ourselves. I think that homosexuality will spread more and more, in proportion to the emancipation of women. A man who grew up in a family where the woman has become dominant, if not the same opportunities for autonomy, it will become homosexual. The weaker sex when a woman is living a dependent man. Man has always kept its supremacy over women, through the privileges provided in a patriarchal family, an education that precludes women the chance of equal opportunities, relegated ignorant, isolated at home. This condition of advantage enjoyed by the man, lasted until humanity was population growth. Now, the woman can win autonomy and equal opportunities, but sometimes even abuse it, because they are not always clearly defined their respective responsibilities, so send their children to their condition and reverses the roles. Male homosexuality is that the result of the fall of the despotic regime of man, by a domineering maternal behavior. The homosexual condition can also be lived in peace, but only if a homosexual does not live totally isolated, but has the chance to meet others like him. The more you socialize and it has the opportunity to improve themselves and also to get rid of those authoritarianism that limit us in our growth, we isolate, prevent us from interacting with society, to learn about human nature, examining the plight of so many others, test statistics, what has been written on the subject. _________________



homosexuality can be lived happily. The state took the place of discomfort due to the inability or the inability to express his / her way of being.
As in a marriage is a choice over the management of economic resources, and is based on a precise balance, in which the man is the source livelihood of women and the next family, the need for economic support that also affects sexual behavior, or sexual problems can be solved without simultaneously tackling the problem even in its economic causes. Every man is born, finding love and protection, since he was born, the mother, which is also subject, however, and becomes a constraint of education, which affects the behavior and sexual desires. The activity of a child is limited to a few simple functions, that of nutrition and expulsion of feces, which also characterize the sexual behavior, if you extend too much dependence on the mother. Will also be rejected by society, insulted and punished, because its inhibition will be interpreted as guilt for having committed a wrongdoing. E 'disease for a child to depend exclusively from the mother because they may never become independent, if not taken over his father, or at least a different and alternative source of economic livelihood. If you can not find a different means of support, the child will develop a preference more or less toward homosexuality, to decide if homosexuality is the mother the stronger power. The child is educated by his father to find sources other than the womb, their economic livelihood - food. His father taught to communicate in a different way in establishing itself socially, to defend themselves from their injuries, to command, and also to take advantage of his kind still left behind. The game is constantly prove his domain, through a moderate form of aggression, that we "take a beating" to acquire skills nell'imporsi socially. The imitation of the father's behavior in society, will be imitated by his son, who will win the function and authority, through the purchase of an inner sense of self, or "pride", which is the result of the satisfaction of themselves, of what is being gained by overcoming many of these tests established environment in which we live and to extract economic resources and its social domination. Examinations that society imposes with sports, work, education. A man who has no self-esteem, feels no desire to regenerate, forming a family, have children, because they are not happy with himself, he will not have a child just as repugnant. _________________________


It 's the father that his son free from the limitations imposed by his mother, and then by the attempt of sexual repression operated by the woman, who only sees the child as a child. In the absence of the father, the child is isolated, unsocial and when you hear becomes fascinated by the social prestige of a man, his desire to emulate it leads to sexual attraction. In the absence of male power, in a family, the son is led by his mother to a state of forced retreat, under its protection, at home, introversion, to reduce their environmental boundaries with those on which she has control . A homosexual is a man who lives then the problems of women, and is difficult to escape the narrow limits of the family, fighting for the rights of homosexuals is like fighting for the emancipation of women. If it happens that a homosexual desires to have children, it would permit as an evil count, as long as they live a successful status. A woman if a man is dominant, the island, makes it weak and insecure. This is because you can not prove what happens in the home closed, or interesting to anyone, unless it is possible to use the complicity of other relatives. The same applies to women, and in fact they defend themselves by increasing the unit with other relatives of the same sex, which is why mothers-sometimes unbearable. The loss of an important family relationship that can cause an imbalance of power between the sexes within a family, resulting in an excess of female power and thus greater homosexuality in boys. One of the conditions that bind to a young mother is the economic dependence, which becomes dominated through a vicious circle, because it can draw on alternative social resources, being rejected by society, whether homosexual. A feature of the behavior would be a greater tendency to save, or "stingy," behavior that betrays his exclusion, but it really is a quality. A homosexual will focus just in sports, with repercussions on the harmonious development of body, tending to a more stunted physical growth, aggravated by a disruption of hormonal activity. The hormone production is also dependent on sexual activity. This is one reason that will induce him to feel more dissatisfied with their body, to look more frequently the mirror. ____________________


Why women are socially subjugated to men? In pursuit of the woman playing a different role from that of man and irreplaceable (only a woman can make a baby). Children born at a time when they are unable to provide for themselves, they are defenseless, and need is someone to provide for their needs (the mother) and someone to provide for both (the father). The woman is subjugated to men by economic difficulties, especially when they are not afforded the same privileges of man. Every man, from the moment when, remains a potential victim of aggression of its own similar, and all life has to defend itself from various hazards. Sexual reproduction reduces the social space of each individual, and therefore the repression of some is caused by numerous problems following the increase in popolosità of a social group as a whole. Problems which call for reducing reproduction. A man who has control over a territory, shows its power at all, even on t the woman, and has. A man wants to hold on things because of the woman, and are led to fight and win the competition with other men with whom quarrels, and possession is also sexual, sexual and prestige, achievement, victory, and even sexual opportunities. And many men just do not have sex as would lose the challenges which need to get the prestige with which to exert a fascination. ____________________


Even the women agree to war with each other, for example through gossip, designed to generate social and sexual inhibition, so to end the rumors and regain the lost freedom must unite to a man. Similarly in the world of homosexuals, a gay man who paid in love, in perseverance has ties, unable to maintain their self-esteem, otherwise it will become easy targets for insults. Surrounded by those who have returned in love, as we estimate, is an important support for the development of self-esteem or "alter-ego." A homosexual hide his homosexuality, defended from abuse and possible undue interference in their private world, by too many people, alien to him. But also because it is reaches a full state of freedom. A place where it can be openly gay, it would be a place where they would have to be repressed heterosexuals. A homosexual makes visible the diversity if its incorrect assessment of the limits of freedom with which he lives. Must reveal their homosexuality, without exaggeration, and places at which persons shall be tolerated. Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were easy to change sexual orientation can be changed as a habit, and fall in love at will of men or women, the feelings were a product of reason, so that we may deny or private, as if we were machines. But our behavior is influenced by other people, and we need an education, exercised through a constriction, a conditioning of their own behavior and reactions.

What causes falling in love? Falling in love may be unilateral or bilateral. Why happen to be triggered by a sense of respect and adulation for certain qualities and abilities and is closely associated with a particular place and living environment. All those behaviors that represent an element of dignity and prestige in the group with you live, cause falling in love. A person with a love life unsatisfactory, it is trivial, stupid, incompetent, socially inferior, little interest in the competition, and to achieve a social purpose, useful and dignified for all. It 'happened to be reviled and persecuted, why? The insult is an invitation to respond, to struggle to compete, to compare in order to call into question the role of social (and sexual) acquired. Homophobia is the result of that constraint (imposed on all alike) how to defend an insult that affects many homosexuals, because they are less trained to fight, and they tend preferentially to defect. The clash makes winning the eterosessauli, because nature rewards those who are able to rebuild their lives after it destroyed. Kill another human being is an opportunity to be granted and reserved only for heterosexuals. The ability to kill, to penetrate the body of a man with a knife, is also a desire sodomitic, being sexually active means of sexual and social power, so we can say that they want to kill people who love to externalize their aggression denied because potential are also sexually repressed and can not reach their goal. An insult to someone, especially a heterosexual, not damage, however, may be destructive to a homosexual, which is more fragile, sensitive and touchy. Some are fun to look straight or gay show, but behave in this way to deceive them at an appropriate time when it will be revealed, to hit them. Hate and insult a gay is inborn in all of psychology, not only heterosexuals, because a gay man is growing weaker, and because "the language of beats where the tooth hurts," are inevitably insulted even in things which are unsafe.
Falling in love involves people who believe in our self-esteem, that must first be happy with themselves and expressions of satisfaction at what has been, that is not to think of something to be imperfect, but think "I am worth something because I passed certain tests where I have demonstrated to all, as myself, to be worth, to be socially useful and important, so I have reason to be estimated, as much as I respect my own. "The social challenge, the clash, as in sports, in school, is the premise of social appreciation, with all the positive consequences arising therefrom, namely the possibility of financial gain, but even more emotional for a payment, because one is loved only by those we respect and believe in us and shares our goals. follows from the self-esteem so even professional success. People who want to take to solve economic problems, should help solve the problems in love, and vice versa, because it applies to both problems the same method resolution: to ensure and facilitate the formation of organizations and the meeting between people. Not having a capacity to self-defense, not knowing how to react to provocation, a gay man loses his sexual conquests, power and social bonds. The homosexual is almost always the loser in both the physical confrontation that in their social status, in everything. It could be argued that homosexuality increases in those populations that tend to desert a clash in the war, as the historical era in which we live. Homophobia is the fear of being affected, however, jump forward for fear of falling back, and it is obvious that heterosexuals have such fears, because We are all air-conditioners, no one is firm in his way of being. Until the recent past was the man the victim in the war, unlike the woman, and only since the war began to involve more people, and therefore women, through genocide and nuclear weapons have finished be fought. So people, now uncontrollable, have rebelled against their "tyrannical", and organized in the republics, disrupting a social order that was centuries old monarchy, which reflected the internal organization of the primary core, the family, in which the power belonged indisputably to father. Human society will always be organized following a monarchist social order, and then each of us is contained in a hierarchical order, in which the right to rule following their duty to obey, and this can be seen, for example, even in the workplace. The dominant role in the couple's relationship has always been heterosexual man, and if in the future will increasingly appianerà this difference, there will never be completely equalized. Homosexuality is the result of a society that does not know how to organize. When the company population growth, reduce their economic resources, if unable to ensure that all the initial wealth, affects the behavior of individuals, frustrating the reproduction, by various methods, including homosexuality. These changes not only lead to homosexuality, but also make it more fragile the marriage bond. It is due to introduce the possibility of divorce, abortion, separation, social emancipation of women. And while it reduces the value and role of the family, increases the superficiality of the ties and then promiscuity. Feminism, the need for emancipation, is the role away from a family now useless, but it is not always true that both the woman to remain under the thumb of man who said that being a housewife is uncomfortable! The woman claims to freedom when the allocation of work and family duties has been reduced. Homosexuality is a behavior, however, will remain sexual hidden, otherwise you lose the main address of the heterosexual libido, which nevertheless must always be the dominant one, the "normal" for the conservation of the species occurs in the expectation that some catastrophic event, such a war, that return space to population growth. Our planet is limited in its resources and its habitability. The current pace of population growth becomes excessive if there is no better economic planning, which forces many to a state of economic hardship and subordination to their families. So, while retaining the differentiation of sex roles, within a family that has developed as a result of playing, you feel the need for empowerment of women because the man's social role, becoming increasingly ill and therefore oppressive, is challenged and wants to be shared. Homosexuals live a similar situation, that a man can be economically dominated by women. The link between homosexuals and women in some circumstances change, and having similar problems, they can share emotions, but by changing their communication skills, will appear at all the other little sociable, unfit, making them even psychological depression.

taboo '- Talking about sex is already having sex. Talking with parents is like having an incestuous relationship with them. It has little dialogue with someone when there is no appropriate mediation setting limits for each other on what to say and how to talk without offending, without sounding stupid, do not overdo it in some bad behavior. Taboos are psychological walls, erected because the sexual act is an intimate act, and if sometimes collapse, causing an incestuous relationship. They should not be demolished, because if it is demolished, destroyed a bond of affection, perhaps with the intention to create another, incestuous. Our sexuality is inherent to a particular type of dialogue of taboo, and you notice, together with the way in which we talk about sex, which is at times vulgar, in others it is puritanical. The children only if they live with parents, staying in the house, has created an incestuous relationship and become asexual. The family is not all, have their distances and its taboos. But when I already miss the affection between the parents, and there is no communication, and if either parent gets this, it becomes oppressive and intrusive, causing repulsion. Parents can not escape their educational role. That requires the simultaneous presence of both parents, so as not to create problems even in children, for example, will not be able to have a satisfying life on romantically. The lack of communication skills learning is resolved to confide in someone, instead of hiding our mistakes, experiencing them as if they were unforgivable. We take refuge in silence when you miss someone that we feel like, so you can not be fully themselves, and break down the box, you reduce the friendships, because it turns away those who may find too many things, and you become lonely. Resorting to a psychologist to address behavioral problems is rarely effective. If human behavior is governed by the fulfillment of their sexual desires, the solution is to find strategies to satisfy them. Psychotherapy is useless if it does not achieve this target, so that psychotherapy can work only if the psychologist sexually attractive. Homosexuality is not the result a genetic trait. We are not born gay nor straight, but it becomes, and the psychological conditioning also cause hormonal disturbances. The mind affects the body's health by altering the hormonal balance.

GAY MARRIAGE - Why formalize and legalize gay marriage in the eyes of all a loving homosexual relationship? what one gets in office? Why do you want to call the marriage relationship of cohabitation between two men, whether they are bound by deep affection or physical attraction?!
The fact that nowadays it is possible to divorce, it is possible that abortion should be provided the pre and extra-marital relationships in the most absolute freedom, the that young people lose their virginity already in early adolescence, has led many people to consider marriage as a union leave now and take it, no stable relationship, but rather useful in the fact that the state associated with this legal constraint, some property rights, and it is perhaps for this reason that some probably do not want to miss this opportunity. The affection that can exist between two men is not to blame, but it is useful and it is always preferable to hate, but who wants to deepen the hatred of the reasons is intimately linked to the need for sexual fulfillment. Homosexuality is not to blame, what must be condemned and sex, as leads to hell, the man away from virtue. Why do two people love one another is not necessary to have sex always and continuously, otherwise it will be an old man who is or is not a male model on the cover?! And who uses the brain and explores the reasons which underlie the need for sex, she also finds the reasons for its ugliness. Gay marriage distorts the meaning of the marriage union which should follow the generation of a new life, and gives the sex, which led to this link, a different value, as if the sex was not sinful. Even during the demonstrations of gay pride parade is a display of obscenity, as if they had these, so we are forced to discuss intellectual issues, while at the same time someone in the most absolute freedom, you put on display their nudity and maybe entertain in sexual acts in front of everyone, without anybody saying anything, or would prevent, or considered to be normal to speak with terminology that refer to sexuality as if it constituted an offense. Which is why you have sex? it is used for breeding, preservation of the human species, and there are other reasons. It served to keep married a man and a woman, so it could only follow the conclusion of the marriage, or even marriage would lose meaning, and this union also served to keep the commitments, because then the children who keep them, if not the household head, through the work? In a couple, there is always a major economic commitment to one another, even in the gay, and probably the application to legalize the union in the state want to download their economic subsistence. The ability to precede sex marriage, have created confusion on the grounds of sex. Sex is a crime. E 'offense even watch a naked body. And without a homosexual sex would no longer have reason to be homosexual. Because sex has to cause reproduction, today, in order to avoid a disorderly and population growth, since you can not choose the solution to suppress and prohibit sex, this being prevented from impossible, it is left free, but you choose to do so will not cause playback, and even with the same sex. In the future, when play will be in the laboratory, to generate superior beings without sexual organs become useless, as are animals such as ants or bees, and the man will be born from an egg technology, even sex will have no effect . The Roman Church, which has imposed chastity for priests, can not rationally make sense it considered a sexual behavior that belongs to the second solution. First preference should be a function of sex is reproduction. Why, what is the reason you have sex? Today a man living in a state of social disadvantage, loneliness and insecurity, can not enjoy all the resources necessary for the formation and maintenance of a new economic family, begins to become too dependent and becomes sexually homosexual. Two people are conflicted when their relationship of cohabitation are divided into roles (that is like saying "I take care of this and I can only take me" and the woman chooses to be a housewife, for example) and this is causing conditions for sexuality and personality dominated, or just or just submissive. If this distinction in a couple of roles becomes clear, however, inevitably becomes one of the two women. A homosexual can pretend male, as long as it is not performed at all. When it comes to sex, you should start by saying that there are varied, depending on the different approach which gives access to two world del'omosessualità but basically, a distinction which is reflected in their sexual preferences, which differ between those who live a dominant or subordinate role. There are those who log on to the gay world only as a momentary diversion, and those who enter there instead because opposite sex does not think more. There is a tendency to consider only a small percentage homosexual, that is a minor portion of the population but that practice homosexuality, which is a lot more. Please note the fact that for example in a place where access although it is still reserved for homosexuals, is done in a certain way, it is most refused. So the gay bars to attract customers, show flyers on which show half-naked men beautiful, and you wonder why homosexuals are so beautiful and manly though. It seems that the environments are places where gay man can win, which is trading her body. From my point of view, homosexuality is just a synonym for sexual pleasure, and is considered the most sinful of heterosexuality as the emotional ties are broken and change much more easily: it is rare to have two gay inextricably tied. In order to understand why homosexuality to pay should understand that a sexual relationship involves the reduction of one of them belonged to another, making it dominated other's will, which links both homosexual or heterosexual, one of the two is increasingly likely of humiliation.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Short Big Poofy Prom Dress

Idiocies scientific

theory of relativity is a consequence of the law E = mc * 2, which states that any body, speeding up the speed of light, is transformed into energy, but what is the matter and energy? if any body can become energy, matter is only made of the same substance? photon?! What we perceive as energy is a tentative issuance photon waiting to be re-absorbed into the matter, brought into the orbits of the electrons, which become increasingly complex and articulated. And the proton? because it turns into photons? or otherwise we could never divide it into at least making it even more elementary particles travel at the speed of light? if the proton energy could be, there would be a complete and continuous transformation of matter and energy, that is, if the stars that produce photons, could transform the whole of their mass, what would be the star?

Einstein's law E = mc * 2 excludes antimatter. By studying the atomic nucleus, it was discovered not only the existence of many other types of particles of low mass inferirore to that of protons and neutrons, but also of antimatter, and its interaction with matter, producing energy. Why do not you think therefore that matter, instead of becoming energy can become antimatter, and that the speed of light is therefore an apparent physical limit. Form of anti-matter can reach any speed. Is it such an opportunity that makes the proton inseparable, as also being formed of antimatter, do not know what to become.
theory of relativity has also changed our understanding of gravity, which becomes the result of four-dimensional geometry of space.
He compared the influence of the gravitational field that of a ball resting on a flexible plan, as a body that travels at the speed of light, does not follow a linear mathematical law, so you can think of it, but follow a linear motion in a curved space, as if space were made of an ethereal substance, deformable funnel-shaped. The comparison was a great success with a famous experiment, conducted in 1919, during a solar eclipse, by Eddington, the deviation of light rays of the stars near large masses like stars themselves. I think that gravity can be regarded not as the result of attraction between heavenly bodies, but the behavior of a heavenly body, when inserted in a field made up of particles, ie a particle will move towards a star not because they were attracted by the star, but why hit by the photons emitted by it, absorbed it, nor affect its motion, which is Devit to fall toward the star, following an almost linear, or curved and orbital like the one that leads to the formation of planets. The atoms are aggregated, first joining in less stable bonds such as molecular covalent, ionic, and then, in which electrons form a cloud that moves inside a rigid aggregate of atomic nuclei. The stars are the result of a more intense aggregation of atoms, which, no longer able to keep the electron cloud from which they were surrounded, they expel the form of photons, but along but not more curved paths straight. This huge emission of photons by the stars, should lead the star to eat and disperse their energy into space, but from my point of view, in reality, the photons are not lost or sold, but are transformed into a small vortex that collects all particles dispersed in space, getting them to enter the gravitational field of the star from which, and most of them in fall, with a rectilinear motion, the star quickly.
Holes blacks should not be construed as the heavenly bodies from which nothing comes out, otherwise how do you create a gravitational field?! Currently it is thought that the force of gravity is carried by gravitons, but (note 1) the same assumption the existence of gravitons, particles that carry the gravitational force, would make the assumption that a body like the blacks holes, emitting particles, all matter can not converge. The severity according to physicists, is transmitted by micro-called gravitons, which has never been detected experimentally 's existence, nor gravitons may be different from the particles already observed. And also, if there was a force gravitazinale, because all the particles observed in the masses, you also attract gravitationally?. Scientists still want to detect gravitational waves as vibrations were issued for example by the explosion of supernovae, through detectors silver much like radio antennae.
The Newton's law of gravity is therefore to be revised because it is more the result of 'attraction between two bodies in space, where the attraction is mutual, but as the induction of a body which is invested in a field whose magnitude is measured, as if, knowing how many particles are there in a given gravitational space, we could predict what happens to a body When, it is invested.

THE BIG BANG THEORY - The discovery that galaxies are moving, in 1929, Hubble has given rise to the Big Bang theory, a theory full of various oddities. The Big Bang theory was born when Hubble discovered the motion of galaxies, by examining the light spectrum of light emanating from them, as a result of a Doppler effect, called redshift, clearly showed that they move. I think it fails to consider the photon as a particle, but as in the aforementioned experiment Eddington in 1919, scientists today consider it to be susceptible to the force of gravity, which would stretch the wavelength. The photons seem susceptible to the force of gravity as shown by the phenomenon of gravitational lensing (ie, a star is able to divert the path of a light beam emitted from the stars behind them until they appear in a different position from that observed without the star itself). This, however, shows that the behavior of the photon is similar to other particles. And so that the photons have a maximum term of life, which could be about 15 billion years, so it is not possible to observe a star at a distance of more than 15 billion light years. If the photons have eternal life, the universe being infinite, the sky appears to us and fully illuminated. If Cosmo had originated from a Big Bang, matter (and even galaxies) should be distributed on the surface of a sphere, uniformly, or at least within a sphere, and we, looking at the sky, we notice them or along a strip in space as in the first case, or to some horizon, and do not see anything below (in the first case) and not anything above it. Perhaps some would object by saying that the light being trapped by the gravity of the Cosmos, would be captured and forced to turn back, but in this case would notice the galaxies moving towards us. The galaxies appear rather chaotically distributed, and the simple fact that they move without any order (some are even the result of a collision), suggests that not go in any direction common and are not influenced by any gravitational field, and not depart smoothly from nothing in common.
If it were true that the universe is expanding, and then it all away from each other and therefore from our own, the radiation emitted light was red redshift only, except for those galaxies along the line that connects us to the point of origin, which appears blue to us, if there are galaxies behind. The galaxies are in a state of chaos, and can not be otherwise, because they are the heavenly bodies as large as possible, any celestial body can change their movement, trapping it in larger gravitational orbits, can not be larger celestial bodies or dense, because there is a limit, namely the impossibility for the matter to travel at speeds exceeding that of light. If the galaxies were driven by the explosion of the Big Bang and expanding as never formed galaxies and stars, many of which have billions of years, even 15 billion years, and even death to give rise to neutron stars, blacks holes or supernova?
The densification which resulted in the formation of stars would have to stop the expansion process. E 'must also say that the cosmos is not only expanding but also in decline, would not otherwise have formed the stars, because the formation of a star comes from a process of densification of the material, and the cosmos would be a cloud of elementary particles ! How to explain the presence in the sky diametrically opposed positions of galaxies of age 15 billion years, the distance separating each other? It 'so obvious that the Universe was born 15 billion years ago. This is just the maximum limit that can get our attention. Why do you think that the universe had an origin at the same time when we know it is infinite, and therefore without origin! We were able to observe at least 10 billion galaxies, each of which consists of billions of stars: why we think that their subject, in a moment of the past, could be thickened in a single infinitesimal point you should then think null and nonexistent? and what can be triggered by the explosion of a single body, which the Universe as it is theorized, without the intervention of an external cause? To me it seems obvious to deduce that if there are external forces, it can only explode or implode! The Universe would have been born from one celestial body, that all matter concentrated at a point in the smallest atomic particle, which means you have the strange belief that the matter infinitely thickener, ie, that nothing has been thought possible to limit the possibility concentration of matter, and then the infinitesimal atomic particle, when we identified the smallest atomic quark particles. And even if it were true that there may be very dense bodies, should therefore think that the matter in the universe is slowly orderly orbits gravitational ever larger, ie galaxies that revolve around larger bodies, which in turn rotate other bodies more dense and so on, when we see do not be so. They also argue that if the Universe originated from a Big Bang, exploded a particle is the smallest atom, and even then it says it is not the only one, namely that the universe did not originate by a single particle. The universe can not be done. If the universe had a limit, beyond that limit should we think that there is another. The Universe is infinite or finite? In my opinion, depending on your point of view, that is to be considered infinite if it is examined in its three-dimensional shape, and ended when observed in its four-dimensional. But at this point we wonder: Are there higher dimensions? No, because the fourth dimension must be understood as the limit beyond which a three-dimensional world can only be transformed, but without being able to exist with the previous one, which is to say that contemporary three-dimensional world can not exist, much less contemporary four-dimensional worlds can exist.
Moreover, if the weather is the last physical dimension of space, we should conceive of the cosmos or immutable, that is all that is past or future is also present, ie, infinite-dimensional three-dimensional parallel (and it is possible to jump into his past by changing history, erasing the chance to be born, or go back to the future with scientific inventions that no one will invent more) or we can conceive the fourth dimension may be limited and only moment of transition, in which the past can become present, without returning the past and the present become the future but none of these three worlds can coexist with each other, meaning you can just stop time, ie away from the surface space of time, as indifferent to gravity, and thereby also make super-fast interstellar travel, as well as meet in future. Our perspective of the universe changes with the speed with which people can travel in it. We see the Universe like the three-dimensional look as if it were infinite, because we can not see it as a whole, so what's there. But in addition it can only be nothing, then we can not separate because we made of nothing, that could not exist. Holes blacks can not exist as understood, were never observed, nor even their possible influence, such as for example the gradual disappearance of certain stars in any region of the sky, or the movement of many galaxies show an escape into their direction, and rotated with the blacks holes, galaxies appear disporsi along a single orbital plane. The holes have been theorized to blacks when it was realized that the gravity can converge the light radiation, but starting perhaps wrongly assumed that gravity cues from nothing.
Stars such as quasars and pulsars, rotating at very high speeds, and are believed to be holes blacks, who reject material captured in a single large project, which revolves with them and makes them look buttons. But because it is a visible phenomenon? If a black hole should not dismiss the matter!

If the universe is expanding, a black hole would stop. If the universe after 15 billion years there was some black hole, should there be someone at least large enough to be noticed, as swallowing stars, there should be some that disappear.
If our universe was a section of a three-dimensional space to four dimensions, born of a black hole that ejects matter from a different dimension of space-time, would be in equilibrium with another universe, like a game of ping-pong, but if you believe that the expansion of our Universe is unidirectional, holes blacks there would be only one.


GEOLOGY - The theory of continental drift

E 'was made a stupid theory that the continents would have been merged into a single continent called Pangea, that the continents were joined along the margin by which they are wet from the seas, as if they were floating rafts on the ocean, but without considering the tectonic plates submerged. It should instead reflect on the fact that the turf is made from which the earth's crust, whose failure is caused by the movement of magma below, may be subjected to seismic movements and earthquakes caused by movement and weight of the oceans and especially the weight of accumulated ice at the poles, and whose influence depends on the rotation of the Earth and by changing the temperature of glaciation. The waters of the seas, running first in the fracture lines and then in the lower areas of the crust, have compounded the erosion of the continents, and in some places ile coasts of the continents appear to parallel this pattern.

Friday, August 6, 2010

How To Remove Port In Bt2700hgv Router

A must-read

Dear reader,

without many preliminaries I suggest you read this extremely serious and critical reflection published on Adista No 62 and available for viewing online to non-subscribers:

After 2 Florence, Naples
For a fraternal and evangelical church - Henry Peyretti

Good thinking!