One of the reasons for the underdevelopment Southern Italy and the world is the greatest distance of some regions of the world than that which is the center of trade, since industrialization began in Northern Europe, in England, while in Europe has its center in Germany. The promoter of economic development for some centuries has changed the world and particularly in the northern part of the world, that was Britain. This transformation has brought the world to industrialise and then a production system faster and then to enrich occurred along with a change that is primarily political in nature, that Britain has changed the world, was the first monarchy to have acquired more power among all nations in the world and having acquired a new institutional form, the parliamentary democratic principle, but also the only one to remain a monarchy, while all others in Europe, became republics. This transformation, in fact, took place in the back of higher power acquired in Europe, thanks to employment of the vast territories of North America, after defeating Spain. Democracy and industrialization processes are occurring simultaneously and are the result of a different way of managing resources. For example, if Spain had been to retain supremacy in America and around the world, today we would not republics, nor industry, but only monarchies and slavery, to the detriment of Africans. Underdevelopment South needs to be solved by increasing and simplifying the road, the trades, so that more distant regions do not remain forgotten and excluded from trade. Obviously the speed of trade is not the only thing having to be more rapid, but also the communications, cultural exchanges. In a system based on productive economic exchange, namely the existence of the market, production activities and spread the wealth by following a pattern like wildfire, which is determined from a central region, and then slowly to reach the more remote locations, so you may risk that the most competitive regions block the economic growth in more peripheral regions, where no central organization common state, allowing a slow and peaceful "invasion" by firms in poorer regions and far. For this reason someone, Karl Marx, had thought of entrusting the production sources only to the state, with a view to promoting a more rational and consistent. However, the way in which these theories have been implemented, in association with a despotic state and fascist as with Stalin, have dissuaded by economists propose these ideas. For that reason, this spread like wildfire of wealth takes place in a more expeditious, and the lifeblood of the market is money, starting from the roots reach all the branches and leaves, they must concentrate and better organize their production sources. For example, in Italy, the city of Milan is the most favored by its geographical position better, and the gap will increase if you do not improve the links with Europe, the Alps, which keep us apart. I build a main road between Rome and Berlin, along the 12th meridian, connecting the central Italian city, directly with the European ones. The Milanese would be excluded but in doing so suffer a lower immigration. In parts of the peninsula, where you can not have vertical and straight roads, you should make coastal roads, and so develop the city is more linearly, is closer to the coasts, since people love to live near the sea, and it shows the summer exodus from inner cities to beaches. Xenophobia can only lead to fascism, as the foreigners away, the people are anchored within national borders, suppressing the freedoms that belong to communism and Nazism. Isolating a people within a border, you have the ability to control and suppress any hostility. Hitler lost the war because the war opened too wide a front, even against Stalin and his twin brother, with whom there was nothing else. The Jews, including great scientists like Einstein and Fermi, emigrating to America, moved to the U.S. the results of their research. It was the Germans who invented the chemical weapons, indeed, German Jews. Hitler has never explained why intolerant of Jews, was away from the people and I think it was the cause of his defeat. He could isolate them in Palestine. You can not delete an entire people simply because different. I think the intolerance of someone as a victim who does not have a place to live in accordance with its laws and customs, which find themselves with others and then the integration is made easier by the possibility to take a break with that " go home. " The creation of the State of Israel has not yet solved the problem of anti-Semitism, but he just turned, as those territories are against them by the Arabs. They have won the war, the same which has spread the Islamic religion and that several centuries was also fought against the Christians during the Crusades in the Middle Ages.
0 comments:
Post a Comment