Our planet is limited in its resources and its habitability, and also sets limits to population growth. The current pace of population growth, therefore, would not allow even to have only two children per couple. It also lengthens the life span.
people in poor countries does not arise at all problems of economic organization, delegating the problem to the nations to which to migrate, it makes children very prolific, believing there are plenty.
Migration is a slow invasion the poorest people, to those nations where power belongs to the people. To reduce fertility in poor countries, migration must be prevented. In the liberal economic system, immigration can not be blocked even if they wanted. However, you can solve the root causes that are ingrained in the political system. E 'is a misconception that immigrants do not detract from, many Italians would surely be willing to move, for example, also providing accommodation to those moves coming from another city, but also by ensuring, for example, the unemployed the opportunity to travel for free (which foreigners already do) (but also because it is a waste to have public transport traveling half-empty). We must not forget that many Italians have enjoyed the ability to migrate, including in particular the southern Europe to America, or in Northern Italy and Northern Europe. However, it is necessary to state that occupies a territory as the American one that was almost deserted, which was and has been for a long time property of anyone or anyone willing to go and live. If you want to allow immigration, we must make a selection, also operates an exchange of persons, such as expelling our prisoners. Because of population growth, the family, which is an important institution, it can very easily fall into crisis, and the law is found to legislate on to new and continuing problems, which first appeared minor. It was necessary, for example, the institution of divorce. I would add, in this regard, the possibility for the children of separated parents, living in a family environment differently. It was necessary to legislate in regard to abortion, which I consider a crime against a living organism, although still in its formative stages. No one is good. Crime is one aspect of the nature of all. I encourage the continuation of the pregnancy followed by adoption, so it is fairer to let a child grow and rely on who can guarantee him a better state. Every child develops its own personality only by staying with her parents, but also entering a larger social group. So professionals must participate in group life, perhaps in a special institution, which in most cases would not be different from one school, but it can also offer a welcome alternative to the family, especially if you are an adoptive family . The adoption must be allowed to anyone who can provide for growth and education of the child, but without breaking the link with their natural parents. For an adopted child should never hidden its origin, because only by comparison with the natural parents, if you can understand the affection before it is sufficiently similar or even better. It 's a psychological necessity that must not be denied even in the case of artificial insemination, or genetic manipulation. The right to raise a child belongs to anyone who tries paternal affection towards him, and we must not overlook the possibility that growth economy, is favored by the state, through child benefit, and that should be bestowed for consistency, to all those who want to adopt a child. The adoption and education of a child it is for those who feel affection for their intelligence and using it for his own good. The adoption and education of a child is not a prerogative of heterosexuals, in fact, if so, who lives with heterosexual parents, would not become homosexual. The capacity to love is demonstrated by intelligence, and vice versa. Anyone should be allowed to adopt and educate a child if this can improve their condition, they can enjoy better economic opportunities, and ultimately more attention, instead of being abandoned. In adopting such animals do not we ask ourselves limits, but they are always very popular, even and especially when to adopt them are lonely people. The claim to equality rights of women stems from the need to change, to a greater population control. The need to be free from the conjugal bond that can lose meaning if forced into the role of housewives only, without being mothers, a condition in which there is no guarantee their future, but not always, because in contrast there are cases where women who are ensured of an economic condition in the employ of his wealthy man is sitting at home, becoming oppressive , a bad mother, the cause of male homosexuality. Their abuses are not recognized and punished: the number of women in prisons is not "equal" to that man, so that they can deceive men, with a false appearance of weakness, meditating in the shade and act as able to create ties and constraints with which to maintain themselves. They get equal rights as men, but once conquered, and do not recognize, discharging their duties only. Animals have rights to live in their natural environment, but their environment is endangered. But it is also the environment in which we live that should change, our environment is unbearable, because there are few trees and parks. The animal testing is a manifestation of cruelty, as it is cruel to a defenseless animal to rip his fur for a coat to do with it, when there are alternative fabrics. Cloning does not mean one man have exactly the same to another, but genetically improved. Cloning and genetic manipulation, I do not immoral, since they are the result of the power acquired by man over nature, and human reason which has dominion over nature. Or should use existing knowledge to produce larger plants and resistant. Those who want to stop biotechnology, including in agriculture, must be isolated and locked until you prove that is detrimental to human health, because it poses a major brake against the development of agriculture and the resolution of the problem of shortage of genres food in poorer countries. Cloning should not be geared to the reproduction of identical individuals, even though I think it impossible, as the development of the personality of a man is always different, but the possibility of obtaining genetically perfect and better, such as the possibility of living more long. I believe contradictory we oppose the new techniques of science and yet you allow the abuse of technology such as pollution, which defends the naturalness of the reproduction, and allows abortion, which denies the spontaneous formation of life, reducing it by a control rational.
0 comments:
Post a Comment